A few sketches of mine have gone up at BrevityTV.com lately.  (Let the fact that all three–and two others–were published in the last 60 days be my excuse for sparse posting here.)

Please enjoy.  I directed the first two, and wrote the third.

It started as one of my favorite shows, and dipped to being a guilty non-pleasure. However, I am now super glad season 8 happened. For those of us who stuck with it though (I kid you not) every episode, the finale was wonderful. It was great to see a callback to scores of characters and moments, clearly designed to honor the fans and the family that made the show. Bill Lawrence clearly wanted a chance to say goodbye to the family he created, and it showed. He liked the characters and the people.

Yo tambien.

Whatever your politics, few would accuse FOX news of actual journalism.  (Nor, any more, does MSNBC deserve the right to the word “news.”) Kudos to them, I guess, for being entertaining/”informative” enough to maintain eyeballs and make a buck.

But, man… The above theatrics from last week features the standard untruthful and inflammatory nature: “operate in a manner opposing my philosophy” I guess is the new definition of “disenfranchise.”  Yet amidst the bloviating, what really offends my sensibilities is Beck’s horrible “comedic” style.  (Sorry to use so many quotation marks, but this issue seems to beg them.  Am I wrong?  He thinks he’s funny, right?)

Here then, some advice to Mr. Beck from a comedy writer:

• If you’ve only got one joke, you don’t milk it a half a dozen times.  You get in and get out.  Or, ideally, you write some more jokes.  Your sarcasm about Cuba was the best writing.  Notice, no gas can.
• Don’t tip your hand and spoil your illusion.  I guess if you need to remind us it’s only water, for lawyers’ sake, then fine, have the little cartoon happen.  But lose the big white sign reading, ‘water’ from the canister.  It’s redundant.  Either way, you’re removing the steam from your gag; getting matches became pointless.
• Instead, douse your poor chump once at the beginning, really well, as you list offenses.  Get all the comedy from that moment possible, all at once.  THEN, spend the rest of your rant waving around a barbecue lighter as the chump cringes in fear that you’ll oafishly get close enough to ignite him.  See how much funnier that is already?  Plus, you drive home your point of carelessness in government.  THEN remind us it was only water, AFTER the whole gag is over.
• Don’t confuse your metaphor.  Is the chump uncomfortable because it’s gasoline, or because it’s cold?
• “We can disagree on policies… but some of us don’t agree on the policies.”  Huh?
• Really?  Slavery?
• Your landing needs work.  Calling for “and end to the games” doesn’t make sense, y’know… in the middle of a game.  Try a callback to your earlier gag, such as finally actually lighting your chump on fire.  You calm down, the threat of ignition is over, the chump exhales his relief but then you accidentally light him on fire.  Now, as he runs screaming in pain via whatever comedic special effect you’d like, or offscreen with sound effects, you drive home your point that this is how much Obama cares about the average American.

See?  Fixing the comedy even stengthened your thesis.  Should you need any help, Mr. Beck, I hire out as a consultant.  To anyone.  (Although in full disclosure, you I would charge extra.)

Big Love remains one of the best shows on TV.  The big stink from the Mormons over the accurate (so HBO says) depiction of one of their sacred ceremonies was pointless.  They did it with respect.  (How many Mormons really watch pay cable?)  Meanwhile, they did another great job of setting up a mess of internal politics to pay off over the next several episodes.

Kings was rich in mythology, but slow.  After the groundwork in the first hour, it was the duplicity and intrigue that showed up in the second hour that offers the most promise that it’ll get good.

Castle was cute.  Not cute enough to add to my overfull list of shows I follow, but if it were my genre, I’d be interested.  Remember Moonlighting?  That’s what they’re setting in motion.

Better Off Ted has promise, especially in its rich overall tone, but didn’t deliver the funny in the pilot.  This may have been a case of all the funniest jokes being spoiled by the trailers.

Scrubs phoned it in.  Sigh.

Lost was a serious filler episode.  Some of the latest big questions seem like contrivances just to make plot happen.  (Why did Sun land thirty years in the future?  Why was Sayid miles from the landing point of Jack, Hurley, and Kate?)

Dollhouse got better. Not awesome yet, but markedly better.

The Battlestar finale was a loveable trainwreck.  The structure of the two-hours was all over the place, and there was a whole lot that was unsatisfying.  But, like in most of the series, you didn’t care about logic or unresolved questions as much as you cared about this cool Art taking place before your eyes.  Mary McDonald is a fantastic actor, and Edward James Olmos made me cry.

On Friday, Neilsen published the first tracking results for online television consumption. The result was that Lost was the big winner, with 1.4 million unique viewers in December.  Saturday Night Live and Grey’s Anatomy followed.

In the case of Lost, that number would be about 5% of an average live broadcast audience.  And since it’s spread over an entire month, really it’s a drop in the bucket.  However, let us remember a couple of things.  First, these figures don’t include sites like Hulu.com.  As far as I am concerned, Hulu features a viewing experience far preferable to any of the network sites, and in cases where it doesn’t just forward the viewer to the network, is probably representative of a comparable number of views.  Meanwhile, in December when these measurements were taken… Lost wasn’t on yet!  The numbers reflect people getting excited to remember all the plot twists before the show returned in January.  We should expect January numbers to be much higher, and February (which would be the first month to have a new episode each Wednesday) to be higher still.

Now recall that, per the 2008 strike settlement, writers make zero dollars during the first seventeen days following network broadcast.  The studios claimed they needed a “promotional” period (never mind that the “promotional” period follows the broadcast…)  They claimed revenues currently are so small that they cannot possibly share.  It is far too early, they said, to know how the internet will play out, or to discuss paying any money to the people who created the content they’re using to forge a new revenue stream for themselves.  Well, I caught Grey’s via the net recently, and I watched Jack-in-the-Box wheeled into a hospital multiple times.  I not only didn’t (couldn’t) fast forward through the commercials like on my TiVo, but–due to the obnoxious repetetiveness–I still remember what the commercial was for, a week later, and I sorta feel like having a Meaty Breakfast Burrito.  Someone made some money, and the writers deserve a percentage.  It doesn’t matter if that percentage is small, but it does matter that there’s a percentage.

Joss Whedon recently spoke about the economics of  Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog, a pioneering effort to develop new content for the internet, and to redefine the business model of production.  In a Wharton interview, he summed up the strike’s results nicely:

We can’t accept anything remotely like [our current situation] with the studios.

When the studios talk about the difficulty of monetizing the Internet, they’re not lying. There are a lot of paradigms wherein you aren’t making that much money. But it’s all pure money for them because they have these libraries they can just put on. They’re really not interested in putting on original stuff because they can just throw the libraries on and make free money off of that. None of us is in that position.

For [the studios] not to offer the creative community a percentage of what they make — they say, “oh, it’s too difficult” and “we’re not going to make any money” — is disingenuous to the point of criminality. What they’re making is pure profit. For them to shut out the people who actually created the content is something that should be looked into by a federal investigatory committee.

That really says it all.  Whatever money you’re making, networks, share.

When you love Joss Whedon’s work as much as I do, it’s difficult to stay objective watching his latest offering. How can I separate my reaction to Dollhouse from my excitement that Joss is once again on TV?  Only with great difficulty.  But I shall attempt to contain my fanboy giddiness in favor of presenting a straight response only to the Dollhouse pilot.

Dollhouse promises a rich mythology all of its own, apropos of a Joss Whedon story.  (Oops…)  The show centers around some super-secret corporation that hires out “actives” to the ultra-wealthy, providing them custom-built personnel perfect for handling extreme situations (or, it seems, dates.)  These agents literally get a new personality and skill set implanted in their brains, specially created for a mission, overwriting all previous memories.

Read the rest of this entry »

I guess after you’re on the air for TWENTY YEARS or so, it’s time to revamp the opening theme.

I’m impressed by how they managed to respect the original, and yet expand it in ways that acknowledge the show’s history and growth.

What do you think?