<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s better than Angelina naked?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/</link>
	<description>musings of a wannabe comedy writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monique</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Monique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>I noticed that the trailer reminded me of old rotoscope animation done modern style.  The fact that they are using one guy&#039;s face, and another one&#039;s body to animate Beowulf is just plain freakish (check IMDB...freakish, I tell you!)


As for old stories told again...I liked the rendition in &quot;Beowulf &amp; Grendel&quot; which came out a couple of years ago. It&#039;s not cheery, for sure, but it gives a very human perspective on Grendel - much the way &quot;Mary Shelley&#039;s Frankenstein&quot; reflected the humanity the monsterwas given in Shelley&#039;s novel.  That the magnificent Neil is involved should give it meat it needs, though I&#039;m still wary after Mirrormask, which somewhat disappointed me.  It&#039;ll be a must-see at any rate...

Now, when will we get that big-screen epic of Gilgamesh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that the trailer reminded me of old rotoscope animation done modern style.  The fact that they are using one guy&#8217;s face, and another one&#8217;s body to animate Beowulf is just plain freakish (check IMDB&#8230;freakish, I tell you!)</p>
<p>As for old stories told again&#8230;I liked the rendition in &#8220;Beowulf &amp; Grendel&#8221; which came out a couple of years ago. It&#8217;s not cheery, for sure, but it gives a very human perspective on Grendel &#8211; much the way &#8220;Mary Shelley&#8217;s Frankenstein&#8221; reflected the humanity the monsterwas given in Shelley&#8217;s novel.  That the magnificent Neil is involved should give it meat it needs, though I&#8217;m still wary after Mirrormask, which somewhat disappointed me.  It&#8217;ll be a must-see at any rate&#8230;</p>
<p>Now, when will we get that big-screen epic of Gilgamesh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screenwriterguy</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how excited I am by the whole digital replacement of actors phenomenon, but that&#039;s another discussion.  It&#039;s definitely cool for use in visual spectacle movies like this one.

Remember that this is the second movie of its type, after &lt;i&gt;Polar Express&lt;/i&gt;.  The six or seven characters played by Tom Hanks in that movie all looked like him, as well.  That movie had a creepy tendency to look &quot;real,&quot; though certainly nothing was as photorealistic as what we&#039;re seeing here.  Clearly &lt;i&gt;Beowulf&lt;/i&gt; is the next generation.  The next project is &lt;i&gt;A Christmas Carol&lt;/i&gt;, starring Jim Carey.  It&#039;ll be more like &lt;i&gt;Express&lt;/i&gt; in that Carey is to play several of the characters.

I would definitely assume we&#039;ll see this in IMAX.  As I understand it, outputting it to the larger format (or to 3D) is easier or more cost-effective  with digital films.  It might take tremendous computing power, but not a lot more expense.

As for the source material, if they&#039;re scraping for titles like &lt;i&gt;Robotech&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Thunder Cats&lt;/i&gt;, why not the oldest story in English?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how excited I am by the whole digital replacement of actors phenomenon, but that&#8217;s another discussion.  It&#8217;s definitely cool for use in visual spectacle movies like this one.</p>
<p>Remember that this is the second movie of its type, after <i>Polar Express</i>.  The six or seven characters played by Tom Hanks in that movie all looked like him, as well.  That movie had a creepy tendency to look &#8220;real,&#8221; though certainly nothing was as photorealistic as what we&#8217;re seeing here.  Clearly <i>Beowulf</i> is the next generation.  The next project is <i>A Christmas Carol</i>, starring Jim Carey.  It&#8217;ll be more like <i>Express</i> in that Carey is to play several of the characters.</p>
<p>I would definitely assume we&#8217;ll see this in IMAX.  As I understand it, outputting it to the larger format (or to 3D) is easier or more cost-effective  with digital films.  It might take tremendous computing power, but not a lot more expense.</p>
<p>As for the source material, if they&#8217;re scraping for titles like <i>Robotech</i> and <i>Thunder Cats</i>, why not the oldest story in English?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/comment-page-1/#comment-473</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2007/09/11/whats-better-than-angelina-naked/#comment-473</guid>
		<description>Please tell me they made this in IMAX???

Really---I think it takes balls to make a movie out of a piece of literature that most people a) have never heard of or b) tried to read in high school but failed or c) did read in high school and was not that enthralled with...I mean really, who can get excited about old old English! And I can speak old English! This film looks amazingly good and I am so excited that they have finally made a animated film in which the characters LOOK like the people playing the voices....November 16th will be a Fine day in my book!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell me they made this in IMAX???</p>
<p>Really&#8212;I think it takes balls to make a movie out of a piece of literature that most people a) have never heard of or b) tried to read in high school but failed or c) did read in high school and was not that enthralled with&#8230;I mean really, who can get excited about old old English! And I can speak old English! This film looks amazingly good and I am so excited that they have finally made a animated film in which the characters LOOK like the people playing the voices&#8230;.November 16th will be a Fine day in my book!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
