<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ScreenwriterGuy.com &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.screenwriterguy.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com</link>
	<description>musings of a wannabe comedy writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fall Show Premiere Reviews.  Each in Four Words.</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2009/09/27/fall-show-premiere-reviews-each-in-four-words/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2009/09/27/fall-show-premiere-reviews-each-in-four-words/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/?p=765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accidentally on Purpose (CBS) Flat, uninspired joke writing. Community (NBC) Gets one more chance. Cougar Town (ABC) Fast-paced. Heavy-handed. Some laughs. Eastwick (ABC) Seen movie? Like that. Flash Forward (ABC) Season&#8217;s best new drama Glee (FOX) Overhyped cheese, but fun. The Good Wife (CBS) Lawyer premise executed well. Modern Family (ABC) Season&#8217;s best new comedy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Accidentally on Purpose </em>(CBS)<br />
Flat, uninspired joke writing.</p>
<p><em>Community</em> (NBC)<br />
Gets <strong>one</strong> more chance.</p>
<p><em>Cougar Town </em>(ABC)<br />
Fast-paced.  Heavy-handed. Some laughs.</p>
<p><em>Eastwick</em> (ABC)<br />
Seen movie?  Like that.</p>
<p><em>Flash Forward</em> (ABC)<br />
Season&#8217;s best new drama</p>
<p><em>Glee </em>(FOX)<br />
Overhyped cheese, but fun.</p>
<p><em>The Good Wife</em> (CBS)<br />
Lawyer premise executed well.</p>
<p><em>Modern Family </em>(ABC)<br />
Season&#8217;s best new comedy</p>
<p><em>Vampire Diaries</em> (CW)<br />
Teen teen teen blech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2009/09/27/fall-show-premiere-reviews-each-in-four-words/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>new show review: Knight Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-knight-rider-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-knight-rider-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KITT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knight Rider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Knight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/?p=596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#8217;t waste your time or mine.  I only watched fifteen minutes, and I haven&#8217;t seen all the new shows yet, but I&#8217;m ready to declare Knight Rider the worst new show of the season. KITT is now evidentally a Transformer.  He literally transforms from a car into a truck at one point (though not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t waste your time or mine.  I only watched fifteen minutes, and I haven&#8217;t seen all the new shows yet, but I&#8217;m ready to declare <em>Knight Rider</em> the worst new show of the season.</p>
<ul>
<li>KITT is now evidentally a Transformer.  He literally transforms from a car into a truck at one point (though not for any particular reason.)  Did you see the <em>Transformers</em> movie?  <em>Knight Rider </em>looks like it will have about that level of substance.</li>
<li>In the overblown command center, one of the perfectly multi-ethnic beautiful people beams, &#8220;This just got interesting!&#8221;  Evidently, she&#8217;s quite pleased that her friends are about to be destroyed by a heat-seeking missile.</li>
<li>The heroine has a &#8220;reason&#8221; to strip out of her cocktail dress before the end of act one.  She was still in bra and panties when I gave up on watching.</li>
<li>The technology strains believability so incredibly far that &#8220;cartoon&#8221; is not an apt analogy.  The original <em>Knight Rider</em> may have been aimed at twelve-year-old boys.  But the average eight-year old watching this newest incarnation will stand up and yell, &#8220;Shyeah! Like THAT could ever happen!&#8221;</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-knight-rider-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>new show review: Gary Unmarried</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-gary-unmarried/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-gary-unmarried/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Unmarried]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Mohr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Adventures of Old Christine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Worst Week]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sitcoms come in two general flavors: the workplace sitcom, and the family sitcom.  Cheers and Cosby.  30 Rock and Leave It to Beaver.  A recent trend among family sitcoms is the acknowledgment that family structure can be complex in our modern day, too.  Gary Unmarried is an example, featuring Jay Mohr as a newly divorcing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Jay Mohr in Gary Unmarried" src="http://www.screenwriterguy.com/images/garyunmarried" alt="" width="175" height="120" align="left" />Sitcoms come in two general flavors: the workplace sitcom, and the family sitcom.  <em>Cheers </em>and <em>Cosby</em>.  <em>30 Rock</em> and <em>Leave It to Beaver</em>.  A recent trend among family sitcoms is the acknowledgment that family structure can be complex in our modern day, too.  <em>Gary Unmarried</em> is an example, featuring Jay Mohr as a newly divorcing father of two attempting to begin a dating life with a client, who has family complexities of her own.</p>
<p>Long story short, it&#8217;s a solid B-grade sitcom.  Nothing amazing, but not a waste of your time.  Jay Mohr, as always, delivers the needed charm.  The character quirks are (more than) defined, and the script offers a few solid laughs without being overly joke-y.</p>
<p><strong>Best aspect</strong>: The cast.  Flat jokes aren&#8217;t oversold.  Characters feel full, even where they are 2-D in the script.  Of course, give some credit to legendary sitcom director James Burrows for his involvement (although he didn&#8217;t direct this particular episode.)</p>
<p><strong>Worst aspect:</strong> A contrived and truncated scene in which Mohr&#8217;s character and new love interest receive unsolicited couples counseling over their one-day-old relationship.</p>
<p><strong>Verdict:</strong> I might check it out again.  I probably rate this show about equal to its hourmate, <em>New Adventures of Old Christine</em>.  That is, it&#8217;s a reasonably fresh reinterpretation of old-school sitcoms.  It&#8217;s not hip enough to belong in the company of <em>30 Rock</em> or <em>The Office</em>.  To this show&#8217;s credit, while I would have a hard time getting my dad to watch either of those to shows, I be he&#8217;d laugh along with <em>Gary Unmarried</em>.  But he&#8217;s a lot more willing to hear yet another joke about a putupon father dealing with a shrill ex.  Wait&#8230; was that a compliment?</p>
<p><strong>Odds of success: </strong> As I mentioned in my review of <em>Worst Week</em>, this year represents and effort by CBS to push from 4 time slots offering sitcoms to 6.  The two new shows will BOTH have to bring in decent ratings and/or reviews for it to work.  (Here&#8217;s <em>hoping </em>they succeed!  Please, please, let there be more comedy writing jobs in the world)  CBS&#8217;s four existing half-hours are all successful, by some measure or another, and the two new shows are both good enough to compliment them.  Given a chance to find their feet and their audience, I could see CBS&#8217;s attempt working.</p>
<div id="adb-tooltip" style="z-index: 1000; position: absolute; display: none; left: 2px; top: 187px;">
<div style="border: 5px solid #c4dae8; margin: 0px; text-transform: uppercase; font-family: arial; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 11px; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; line-height: 13px; background-color: white; color: #333333;">
<div style="border: 1px solid #78b3d9; padding: 5px; text-align: left;">
<div>Person<span style="color: #006699;"> Gary Unmarried</span></div>
<div style="text-transform: none; color: #999999; line-height: 14px;">Right click for SmartMenu shortcuts</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/25/new-show-review-gary-unmarried/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>new show review: Worst Week</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/23/new-show-review-worst-week/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/23/new-show-review-worst-week/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good enough. Not good, but good enough. Are you the kind of viewer who expects a sitcom to deliver a little mindlessness at the end of a long day? Are you the kind of viewer who thinks Arrested Development or 30 Rock asks too much from you? If your TV is on CBS on Mondays [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><img class="alignleft" title="Worst Week" src="http://www.screenwriterguy.com/images/worstweek.jpg" alt="" width="208" height="120" align="left" />Good enough.  Not good, but good enough.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Are you the kind of viewer who expects a sitcom to deliver a little mindlessness at the end of a long day?  Are you the kind of viewer who thinks <em>Arrested Development</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> or </span><em>30 Rock</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> asks too much from you?  If your TV is on CBS on Mondays at 9:30, you just watched </span><em>Two and a Half Men</em><span style="font-style: normal;">, so the answer is very likely yes.  If that&#8217;s your style, </span><em>Worst Week</em><span style="font-style: normal;"> will certainly be good enough for you.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-style: normal;">The show is about Sam, an every guy with very bad luck.  He has impregnated his girlfriend, and tonight they plan to tell her parents, who, by the way, hate Sam.  And then bad stuff happens, and then more bad stuff happens, and then it gets more complicated until it&#8217;s over.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Inspired by a British show, one can see </span><em>Worst Week</em><span style="font-style: normal;">&#8216;s drawing room farce roots showing.  In general, though, the escalating chain of complication fails to seem clever, original, or witty.  If they get that part right, they&#8217;ll have a strong foundation upon which to drape those flourishes.  Ironically, the best place to look for inspiration would be </span><em>Arrested Development</em><span style="font-style: normal;">—one of those shows that expects you to pay attention.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Best aspect: </strong><span style="font-style: normal;"><span>It&#8217;s potential.</span></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Worst aspect:</strong> Central plot point involving pee.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Verdict: </strong><span> I won&#8217;t turn it off if it comes on.  But I&#8217;m not adding it to my DVR.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Odds of success: </strong><span>Strangely, I think I have to pin </span><em><span>Worst Week&#8217;s</span></em><span style="font-style: normal;"><span> success on the performance of </span></span><em><span>Gary Unmarried</span></em><span style="font-style: normal;"><span> on Wednesday.  If that show makes a successful pair with </span></span><em><span>New Adventures of Old Christine</span></em><span style="font-style: normal;"><span>, CBS will have two nights that feature sitcoms.  That will mean Mondays at 9:30 will need a slot-filler.  And, as I mentioned, </span></span><em><span>Worst Week</span></em><span style="font-style: normal;"><span> is good enough.  If, however, one or the other of the shows fails to deliver the ratings, look for the best four or five shows to get collapsed back into Mondays.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/23/new-show-review-worst-week/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>new show review: Privileged</title>
		<link>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/18/new-show-review-privileged/</link>
		<comments>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/18/new-show-review-privileged/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 05:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>screenwriterguy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.screenwriterguy.com/?p=327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Privileged is the story of Megan Smith, a journalist struggling because she wants to do REAL journalism instead of fluff. (Yes, we&#8217;ve seen that before. It won&#8217;t be the last overused story element.) Her boss essentially fires her, but offers to set her up with another employment opportunity, presumably interviewing or writing for an uber-wealthy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><img class="alignleft" title="JoAnna Garcia in Privileged" src="http://www.screenwriterguy.com/images/privileged.jpg" alt="" width="172" height="120" align="left" /><em>Privileged </em>is the story of  Megan Smith, a journalist struggling because she wants to do REAL journalism instead of fluff.  (Yes, we&#8217;ve seen that before.  It won&#8217;t be the last overused story element.)  Her boss essentially fires her, but offers to set her up with another employment opportunity, presumably interviewing or writing for an uber-wealthy foundation chairwoman, played by Anne Archer.  Archer&#8217;s character has two granddaughters, spoiled heiresses.  (Even the show points out how often we&#8217;ve seen that before.)  Grandma offers Megan a super-plush arrangement&#8211;room, board, a sweet car, and her days free to pursue her writing—if Megan will tutor the grandkids in the evenings.  There&#8217;s some other stuff with a down-to-earth prince charming,  an estranged sister, etc., but I don&#8217;t want to make it sound too much more complex than it is.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;">Perhaps its because I pay the bills as a professional yuppie larva trainer myself that I connected a bit with this show.  Yes, it&#8217;s light fare.  Lite, even.  But, hey, while <em>Privileged</em> may be painting in archetypical characters, it<em> </em><span style="font-style: normal;">promises to focus on the </span><span style="font-style: normal;"><span>relationships</span></span><span style="font-style: normal;"> between those archetypical characters in a worthwhile way.  If this is your type of show, <em>Privileged </em>is at least a solid entry in its genre.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Best aspect:</strong> JoAnna Garcia, doing her best Amy Adams, seems to have the charm to anchor a show.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Worst aspect</strong>:  Meanwhile, Garcia stays only this side of cloying so far.  Also, there ain&#8217;t a whole lot of subext in this writing.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Verdict:</strong> Pretty sure I&#8217;m not the target demographic here&#8230;</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><strong>Odds of success:</strong> It&#8217;s a niche show, so it&#8217;ll never score huge numbers.  But on CW, it doesn&#8217;t take too many million to define a hit.  While it has some competition in its time slot, <em>Privileged</em> follows <em>90210</em>.  That could be a smart lead-in for this kind of programming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.screenwriterguy.com/2008/09/18/new-show-review-privileged/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
